Comments on: Muxtape=Love? http://headsparks.com/2008/04/14/muxtapelove/ //in the glow, then it fades Thu, 06 Oct 2011 18:48:24 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: daniel so http://headsparks.com/2008/04/14/muxtapelove/#comment-2855 Mon, 14 Apr 2008 17:16:50 +0000 http://headsparks.wordpress.com/?p=298#comment-2855 Stan — Thanks for stopping by. I readily admit that I am woefully behind the times. Because I’m not particularly cutting-edge with most things interwebs, I usually only check out things passed along by friends and acquaintances — in this case, none have been a part of imeem (although I have seen it mentioned here and there) but a few have created muxtapes.
* * *
I noticed the muxtape limitations as well. If I were to hazard a guess, though, I would imagine that the 12 track limit and 10mb per song limit goes toward the simplicity they’re trying to convey with their layout (and, I’m sure, easing the workload of their site). But, then again, who really knows? In any case, thanks for the info about imeem — I’ll try to check them out.

]]> By: Stan Rich http://headsparks.com/2008/04/14/muxtapelove/#comment-2854 Mon, 14 Apr 2008 05:48:31 +0000 http://headsparks.wordpress.com/?p=298#comment-2854 Am I missing something with all this love for muxtape?
muxtape is just imeem.com except:
* there’s a 10Mb limit on track sizes
* there’s a 12 track limit on mixes
* it’s 2 years late

muxtape is only interesting if you’ve somehow managed to miss imeem.com doing its ‘youtube for music’ impoersonation for the past couple of years.

]]>